The results of a genetic study are not definitive, and in the case of variants of uncertain significance, it is necessary to continue investigations to clarify their meaning.

In-depth review of your patient's phenotype (deep phenotyping).
  • The phenotypes of genetic diseases in the pediatric age group can change over time, so clinical follow-up may provide relevant information in the future that allows the variant to be reclassified.
  • Since pathogenicity interpretations by genetics laboratories use standardized phenotype coding systems, it may be useful to use HPO terms for their description, and thus provide more information to the geneticist for their analysis.
Perform a family segregation study.

The family segregation study can lead to several possible outcomes:

Parental study confirms that the variant is de novo.

In the event that family members are asymptomatic, the detection of a de novo variant (with biochemical confirmation of parentage to exclude the possibility of falsely attributed paternity) in an autosomal dominant or X-linked gene, which has been previously implicated in a similar phenotype, reinforces its pathogenicity. However, it is necessary to remember that all individuals carry around 80-100 de novo mutations in their genome, of which 1-2 can potentially be found in the exome.

Parental study confirms that the variant is inherited from an asymptomatic parent.

In some circumstances, demonstrating that the variant has been inherited from an asymptomatic parent can reinforce its benign nature. However, this information must be interpreted with caution, especially in autosomal dominant inheritance genes that exhibit variable penetrance, in which case, this information would not modify the pathogenicity classification.

Parental study confirms that the variant segregates with the phenotype in the family.

In practice, it is difficult to demonstrate that the finding has not occurred by chance if only parental studies are available, unless a large pedigree is available and we have been able to study multiple family members across several generations, both affected and unaffected.

Parental study confirms that the variant is in trans with a previously identified pathogenic variant.

In the event that the gene involved is of autosomal recessive inheritance, and we have found two genetic variants, but only one of them can be classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, it may be useful to perform a family study, yielding 2 possible outcomes:

  • Each variant has been inherited from one parent (and therefore, they are in trans in the index case), which is compatible with autosomal recessive inheritance.
  • Both variants have been inherited from the same parent (and are in cis, i.e., on the same allele, in the index case), in which case the variants found would not be responsible for an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern.
Biochemical studies, functional studies and studies of RNA expression.
  • If the identified gene has a biomarker, as in the case of inborn errors of metabolism, there can be performed targeted biochemical investigations, such as an enzymatic study, to demonstrate that the identified variant produces an in vivo impact.
  • If this is not possible, and it is suspected that the location of the variant may have consequences on splicing or RNA expression, RNA sequencing studies can be performed to confirm this.
  • In centers that have basic research groups or are in contact with them, functional studies on biosimilar organisms, knock-outs, or other experimental techniques can be carried out.
Periodically reanalyze databases.

The process of classifying genetic variants is dynamic, and depends on the information available at the time of analysis, but a dizzying accumulation of information is occurring that can lead to a change in interpretation if a reanalysis is carried out after a period of time. It is estimated that 10% of variants of uncertain significance can be reclassified upon reanalysis after 2 years and become pathogenic or likely pathogenic.

There are several tools to review the current classification of a VUS based on updated data.

The probability is also not the same depending on the prior pathogenicity classification:

19955111 {19955111:7P4AN7TX} 1 vancouver 50 default 1822 https://neuropediatoolkit.org/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%227P4AN7TX%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A19955111%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Karbassi%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222016%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A3%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bclear%3A%20left%3B%20%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-left-margin%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfloat%3A%20left%3B%20padding-right%3A%200.5em%3B%20text-align%3A%20right%3B%20width%3A%201em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B1.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-right-inline%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bmargin%3A%200%20.4em%200%201.5em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BKarbassi%20I%2C%20Maston%20GA%2C%20Love%20A%2C%20DiVincenzo%20C%2C%20Braastad%20CD%2C%20Elzinga%20CD%2C%20et%20al.%20A%20Standardized%20DNA%20Variant%20Scoring%20System%20for%20Pathogenicity%20Assessments%20in%20Mendelian%20Disorders.%20Human%20Mutation%20%5BInternet%5D.%202016%20%5Bcited%202022%20Sept%2022%5D%3B37%281%29%3A127%26%23x2013%3B34.%20Available%20from%3A%20%26lt%3Ba%20class%3D%26%23039%3Bzp-ItemURL%26%23039%3B%20href%3D%26%23039%3Bhttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1002%5C%2Fhumu.22918%26%23039%3B%26gt%3Bhttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1002%5C%2Fhumu.22918%26lt%3B%5C%2Fa%26gt%3B%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22A%20Standardized%20DNA%20Variant%20Scoring%20System%20for%20Pathogenicity%20Assessments%20in%20Mendelian%20Disorders%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Izabela%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Karbassi%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Glenn%20A.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Maston%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Angela%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Love%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Christina%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22DiVincenzo%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Corey%20D.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Braastad%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Christopher%20D.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Elzinga%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Alison%20R.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Bright%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Domenic%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Previte%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Ke%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Zhang%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Charles%20M.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Rowland%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Michele%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22McCarthy%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Jennifer%20L.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Lapierre%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Felicita%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Dubois%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Katelyn%20A.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Medeiros%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Sat%20Dev%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Batish%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Jeffrey%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Jones%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Khalida%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Liaquat%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Carol%20A.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Hoffman%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Malgorzata%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Jaremko%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Zhenyuan%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Wang%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Weimin%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Sun%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Arlene%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Buller-Burckle%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Charles%20M.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Strom%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Steven%20B.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Keiles%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Joseph%20J.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Higgins%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22We%20developed%20a%20rules-based%20scoring%20system%20to%20classify%20DNA%20variants%20into%20five%20categories%20including%20pathogenic%2C%20likely%20pathogenic%2C%20variant%20of%20uncertain%20significance%20%28VUS%29%2C%20likely%20benign%2C%20and%20benign.%20Over%2016%2C500%20pathogenicity%20assessments%20on%2011%2C894%20variants%20from%20338%20genes%20were%20analyzed%20for%20pathogenicity%20based%20on%20prediction%20tools%2C%20population%20frequency%2C%20co-occurrence%2C%20segregation%2C%20and%20functional%20studies%20collected%20from%20internal%20and%20external%20sources.%20Scores%20were%20calculated%20by%20trained%20scientists%20using%20a%20quantitative%20framework%20that%20assigned%20differential%20weighting%20to%20these%20five%20types%20of%20data.%20We%20performed%20descriptive%20and%20comparative%20statistics%20on%20the%20dataset%20and%20tested%20interobserver%20concordance%20among%20the%20trained%20scientists.%20Private%20variants%20defined%20as%20variants%20found%20within%20single%20families%20%28n%20%3D%205%2C182%29%2C%20were%20either%20VUS%20%2880.5%25%3B%20n%20%3D%204%2C169%29%20or%20likely%20pathogenic%20%2819.5%25%3B%20n%20%3D%201%2C013%29.%20The%20remaining%20variants%20%28n%20%3D%206%2C712%29%20were%20VUS%20%2838.4%25%3B%20n%20%3D%202%2C577%29%20or%20likely%20benign%5C%2Fbenign%20%2834.7%25%3B%20n%20%3D%202%2C327%29%20or%20likely%20pathogenic%5C%2Fpathogenic%20%2826.9%25%2C%20n%20%3D%201%2C808%29.%20Exact%20agreement%20between%20the%20trained%20scientists%20on%20the%20final%20variant%20score%20was%2098.5%25%20%5B95%25%20confidence%20interval%20%28CI%29%20%2898.0%2C%2098.9%29%5D%20with%20an%20interobserver%20consistency%20of%2097%25%20%5B95%25%20CI%20%2891.5%2C%2099.4%29%5D.%20Variant%20scores%20were%20stable%20and%20showed%20increasing%20odds%20of%20being%20in%20agreement%20with%20new%20data%20when%20re-evaluated%20periodically.%20This%20carefully%20curated%2C%20standardized%20variant%20pathogenicity%20scoring%20system%20provides%20reliable%20pathogenicity%20scores%20for%20DNA%20variants%20encountered%20in%20a%20clinical%20laboratory%20setting.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222016%22%2C%22section%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partNumber%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partTitle%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.1002%5C%2Fhumu.22918%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1002%5C%2Fhumu.22918%22%2C%22PMID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22PMCID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%221098-1004%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2284TR57I6%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222026-05-09T06%3A19%3A52Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
1.
Karbassi I, Maston GA, Love A, DiVincenzo C, Braastad CD, Elzinga CD, et al. A Standardized DNA Variant Scoring System for Pathogenicity Assessments in Mendelian Disorders. Human Mutation [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Sept 22];37(1):127–34. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/humu.22918
19955111 {19955111:IZ7ZPLNJ} 1 vancouver 50 default 1822 https://neuropediatoolkit.org/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22IZ7ZPLNJ%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A19955111%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22parsedDate%22%3A%222022-09-22%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A3%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bclear%3A%20left%3B%20%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-left-margin%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bfloat%3A%20left%3B%20padding-right%3A%200.5em%3B%20text-align%3A%20right%3B%20width%3A%201em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B1.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-right-inline%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bmargin%3A%200%20.4em%200%201.5em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3BNothing%26%23x2019%3Bs%20for%20sure%2C%20that%26%23x2019%3Bs%20for%20sure%3A%20Evaluating%20variants%20of%20uncertain%20significance%20%7C%20Beyond%20the%20Ion%20Channel%20%5BInternet%5D.%202022%20%5Bcited%202022%20Sept%2022%5D.%20Available%20from%3A%20%26lt%3Ba%20class%3D%26%23039%3Bzp-ItemURL%26%23039%3B%20href%3D%26%23039%3Bhttp%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fepilepsygenetics.net%5C%2F2016%5C%2F08%5C%2F11%5C%2Fnothings-for-sure-thats-for-sure-evaluating-variants-of-uncertain-significance%5C%2F%26%23039%3B%26gt%3Bhttp%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fepilepsygenetics.net%5C%2F2016%5C%2F08%5C%2F11%5C%2Fnothings-for-sure-thats-for-sure-evaluating-variants-of-uncertain-significance%5C%2F%26lt%3B%5C%2Fa%26gt%3B%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22blogPost%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Nothing%5Cu2019s%20for%20sure%2C%20that%5Cu2019s%20for%20sure%3A%20Evaluating%20variants%20of%20uncertain%20significance%20%7C%20Beyond%20the%20Ion%20Channel%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22%22%2C%22blogTitle%22%3A%22%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222022-09-22%2017%3A29%3A43%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fepilepsygenetics.net%5C%2F2016%5C%2F08%5C%2F11%5C%2Fnothings-for-sure-thats-for-sure-evaluating-variants-of-uncertain-significance%5C%2F%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22en-US%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%22B4B6FZGE%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222026-05-09T09%3A35%3A10Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
1.
Nothing’s for sure, that’s for sure: Evaluating variants of uncertain significance | Beyond the Ion Channel [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Sept 22]. Available from: http://epilepsygenetics.net/2016/08/11/nothings-for-sure-thats-for-sure-evaluating-variants-of-uncertain-significance/